Defendant filed a motion in limine in lieu of a motion to suppress which was otherwise out of time. A motion in limine isn\u2019t a substitute for a motion to suppress. Nevertheless, the court goes to the merits of the search claim and finds for the government. The search was valid as an inventory. United States v. Romero, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55762 (D. Alaska Mar. 26, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff cites three cases that he says show the officer used excessive force, but none of them is close enough on the facts to make it \u201cclearly established law\u201d for qualified immunity. Martinez v. Harris County, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7023 (5th Cir. Mar. 26, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s claim in the briefs that the cell phone was hers isn\u2019t supported by the evidence, so no standing. United States v. Lussier, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55795 (D. Minn. Mar. 26, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s traffic stop was valid because of a traffic offense and because collective knowledge showed he was suspected of possessing drugs. United States v. Solomon, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55777 (N.D. Ga. Mar. 26, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant filed a motion in limine in lieu of a motion to suppress which was otherwise out of time. A motion in limine isn\u2019t a substitute for a motion to suppress. Nevertheless, the court goes to the merits of the … Continue reading