An overnight guest had standing in the house but not the backyard. United States v. Halley, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53342 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 24, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Even if there was a false statement in the affidavit for search warrant, it wasn\u2019t material to the finding of probable cause. Franks hearing denied. United States v. Kovacic, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53480 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 24, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Some of evidence here was discovered before any illegality, so the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine doesn\u2019t apply to that. The trial court erred in dismissing the whole case. State v. Brinson, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 2267 (Fla. 6th DCA Mar. 21, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2254 petitioner\u2019s claim that admission at trial of the affidavit for warrant violated the Confrontation Clause is instead subject to harmless error analysis under the unreasonable application standard. Even if true, it was harmless as a whole. Stallings v. Chase, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6804 (7th Cir. Mar. 24, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
An overnight guest had standing in the house but not the backyard. United States v. Halley, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53342 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 24, 2025). Even if there was a false statement in the affidavit for search warrant, it … Continue reading