{"id":60321,"date":"2025-03-06T08:19:30","date_gmt":"2025-03-06T13:19:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=60321"},"modified":"2025-03-06T08:19:30","modified_gmt":"2025-03-06T13:19:30","slug":"ks-in-responding-to-sw-out-of-state-social-media-companys-authentication-statement-substantially-complied-with-state-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=60321","title":{"rendered":"KS: In responding to SW, out-of-state social media company&#8217;s authentication statement substantially complied with state law"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In responding to a search warrant request, the social media company provided Rule 901 authentication for that state \u201cunder penalty of perjury,\u201d but under the law of the United States not the State of Kansas. It was under penalty of perjury and that\u2019s substantial compliance with state law. <a href=\"https:\/\/searchdro.kscourts.gov\/documents\/pdf\/caseDecisions\/e36ed602-1c5f-4c1a-abc2-58ac34443942_126238.pdf\">State v. Kemp<\/a>, 2025 Kan. App. LEXIS 10 (Feb. 28, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Probable cause a traffic violation occurred is justification for this stop even if it was pretextual for drugs. United States v. Burgman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36064 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 28, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The district court credited the officers that there was a traffic violation supporting the stop, and the videos did not contradict it. United States v. Hunter, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 4743 (6th Cir. Feb. 26, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In responding to a search warrant request, the social media company provided Rule 901 authentication for that state \u201cunder penalty of perjury,\u201d but under the law of the United States not the State of Kansas. It was under penalty of &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=60321\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[66,86,16,133],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60321","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-burden-of-proof","category-pretext","category-warrant-execution","category-warrant-papers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60321","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=60321"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60321\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60322,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60321\/revisions\/60322"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=60321"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=60321"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=60321"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}