{"id":60038,"date":"2025-02-05T10:09:11","date_gmt":"2025-02-05T15:09:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=60038"},"modified":"2025-02-05T10:09:11","modified_gmt":"2025-02-05T15:09:11","slug":"id-state-completely-failed-to-support-justification-for-inventory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=60038","title":{"rendered":"ID:  State completely failed to support justification for inventory"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\u201cThe record is devoid of evidence to support the conclusion that Detective Uhrig&#8217;s decision to impound Smith&#8217;s car was reasonable under the circumstances.\u201d The inventory depending on the legality of the impoundment. Reversed. <a href=\"https:\/\/isc.idaho.gov\/opinions\/49909x.pdf\">State v. Smith<\/a>, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 8 (Jan. 30, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The affidavit for search warrant for defendant\u2019s phone actually lacked probable cause, but the trial court found the good faith exception applied. On appeal, that finding was not against the preponderance of the evidence. Vasquez v. State, 2025 Ark. App. 65 (Feb. 5, 2025).* (The conviction was reversed on other grounds.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies, and thus evidence obtained from Carter&#8217;s real-time cell site location information should not be suppressed, because law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the federal Stored Communications Act, which explicitly permitted this. State v. Carter, 2025 S.C. LEXIS 14 (Jan. 29, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cThe record is devoid of evidence to support the conclusion that Detective Uhrig&#8217;s decision to impound Smith&#8217;s car was reasonable under the circumstances.\u201d The inventory depending on the legality of the impoundment. Reversed. State v. Smith, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 8 &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=60038\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60038","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-good-faith-exception","category-inventory"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=60038"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60038\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60039,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60038\/revisions\/60039"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=60038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=60038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=60038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}