Defendant fled, he said, in fear of his life, not knowing that it was the police. He abandoned property in flight. The fact the later arrest might turn out to be invalid doesn\u2019t undo the abandonment. United States v. Ross, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 237310 (E.D. Tenn. Dec. 18, 2024), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7104 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 14, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Officers had a motel parking lot under surveillance and saw defendant\u2019s car. They found an arrest warrant and made the arrest. The inventory was valid. United States v. Potter, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 905 (8th Cir. Jan. 15, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Officers stopped defendant for not having a front license plate. The stop led to a confrontation, and defendant refused to stop or accede to reasonable requests. He was moving around in his car and attempted to drive at one of the officers. Pulling their weapons was not unreasonable. United States v. Delpriore, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 898 (9th Cir. Jan. 13, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2254 petitioner\u2019s Fourth Amendment claim was a successor petition and barred. In re McGore, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 900 (6th Cir. Jan. 14, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant fled, he said, in fear of his life, not knowing that it was the police. He abandoned property in flight. The fact the later arrest might turn out to be invalid doesn\u2019t undo the abandonment. United States v. Ross, … Continue reading