{"id":59812,"date":"2025-01-11T11:59:25","date_gmt":"2025-01-11T16:59:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=59812"},"modified":"2025-01-11T16:04:54","modified_gmt":"2025-01-11T21:04:54","slug":"s-d-ala-failure-to-timely-make-sw-return-under-state-law-not-a-4a-issue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=59812","title":{"rendered":"S.D.Ala.: Failure to timely make SW return under state law not a 4A issue"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The fact the search warrant paperwork wasn\u2019t returned on time which made it void under state law isn\u2019t relevant under the Fourth Amendment in federal court. Jackson v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235912 (S.D. Ala. Dec. 4, 2024), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1654 (S.D. Ala. Jan. 6, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The issue here is whether defense counsel was ineffective for not raising an issue of the presence of an HBO film crew during the drug search. That was litigated in state post-conviction, and the claim failed on the merits. It can\u2019t be relitigated here. Harmon v. Payne, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2371 (E.D. Ark. Jan. 7, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant agreed to forfeiture in his plea agreement, and he can\u2019t get return of property now. United States v. Grabau, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2367 (N.D. Iowa Jan. 7, 2025).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The defendant officer\u2019s use of force to attempt to break up a fight was reasonable. Imbriano v. Murray, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2406 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2025).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The fact the search warrant paperwork wasn\u2019t returned on time which made it void under state law isn\u2019t relevant under the Fourth Amendment in federal court. Jackson v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235912 (S.D. Ala. Dec. 4, 2024), &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=59812\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[52,63,67,132,133],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-excessive-force","category-reasonableness","category-rule-41g-return-of-property","category-unreasonable-application--2254d","category-warrant-papers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=59812"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59812\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59817,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59812\/revisions\/59817"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=59812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=59812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=59812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}