Months of electronic surveillance gave probable cause for defendant\u2019s stop and search. Police use of a cover story for the stop was reasonable to prevent other co-conspirators from finding out. United States v. Arrington, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222969 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was reasonable suspicion for defendant\u2019s stop for parking in a fire lane, but not for drinking in a vehicle. United States v. Morgan, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222886 (D. Md. Dec. 9, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The 48 hour P&A rule was violated, but there was no prejudice. Perez v. Pallares, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223254 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As defendant drove, the temporary tag was lifted by the air flow and was thus unreadable. That was reasonable suspicion for a stop, even though the tag was visible when he stopped. State v. Gaither, 2024-Ohio-5777 (7th Dist. Dec. 5, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Months of electronic surveillance gave probable cause for defendant\u2019s stop and search. Police use of a cover story for the stop was reasonable to prevent other co-conspirators from finding out. United States v. Arrington, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222969 (E.D. … Continue reading