Defendant\u2019s stop was for riding a bicycle in the center of the road, but when finally stopped, he had a large sheathed knife on him, and that justified a frisk. State v. Hayes, 2024-Ohio-5545 (12th Dist. Nov. 25, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cDefendant complains about whether one of his lawyers liked him and whether another was too young to handle the case. He also provides a self-serving history about the circumstances of his arrest and the investigation. None of these arguments entitle him to relief.\u201d Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress that was obviously going nowhere. United States v. Milke, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214069 (E.D. Ark. Nov. 25, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The search warrant materials were late being disclosed but long enough before trial that the defense can\u2019t show prejudice. People v. Irving, 2024 NY Slip Op 51602(U), 2024 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 22419 (Kings Co. Nov. 12, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant prevails in an ineffective assistance of counsel claim that defense counsel failed to move to suppress a protective sweep done without justification. Remanded for a full suppression hearing. State v. Jones, 2024-Ohio-5501 (1st Dist. Nov. 22, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s stop was for riding a bicycle in the center of the road, but when finally stopped, he had a large sheathed knife on him, and that justified a frisk. State v. Hayes, 2024-Ohio-5545 (12th Dist. Nov. 25, 2024).* \u201cDefendant … Continue reading