The exclusionary rule does not apply in pretrial release revocations. Indeed, previously suppressed evidence can be considered on the factors for release. United States v. Cuevas, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185724 (D. Idaho Oct. 9, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cAssuming without deciding that the Facebook warrant was invalid, we conclude that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies. The Facebook warrant was not \u2018so facially deficient\u2019 that no reasonable officer could have relied on its validity. \u2026 On the contrary, the warrant was sufficiently particularized as it was cabined to ascertaining location data associated with a single Facebook account over a 30-day period.\u201d United States v. Perkins, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 25680 (4th Cir. Oct. 11, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff\u2019s complaint the CIA was surveilling him fails for lack of specificity as to when, where, and how. Story v. CIA, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185671 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The exclusionary rule does not apply in pretrial release revocations. Indeed, previously suppressed evidence can be considered on the factors for release. United States v. Cuevas, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185724 (D. Idaho Oct. 9, 2024). \u201cAssuming without deciding that … Continue reading