The affidavit for the warrant here is more than \u201cbare bones\u201d so the good faith exception applies. \u201cEven if the good-faith exception did not apply, the warrant is still valid because it is supported by probable cause.\u201d United States v. Hernandez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173254 (N.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2024).* This is backwards because probable cause should not be subordinate to the good faith exception. But it\u2019s Kacsmaryk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant abandoned the firearm before the stop. United States v. Manigault, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 24435 (3d Cir. Sep. 26, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As a passenger in a car, defendant had no standing in it. United States v. De Jesus, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174051 (D.P.R. Sep. 24, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Nothing from the cell phone search was used at the trial, so there\u2019s nothing to appeal over the denial of the motion to suppress. Brown v. State, 2024 Ark. App. 461 (Sep. 25, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The affidavit for the warrant here is more than \u201cbare bones\u201d so the good faith exception applies. \u201cEven if the good-faith exception did not apply, the warrant is still valid because it is supported by probable cause.\u201d United States v. … Continue reading