Handwritten alterations on the search warrant to match the same subjects as the affidavit were authorized by the issuing magistrate and were valid. And, even if this made it overbroad, it was still valid under the good faith exception. United States v. Taylor, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158491 (S.D. Ind. Sep. 4, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cBecause it was reasonable to believe that Martinez’s vehicle contained evidence of his drug trafficking offenses, arresting officers could search his vehicle consistent with the Fourth Amendment.\u201d United States v. Martinez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 22407 (9th Cir. Sep. 4, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s stop was justified for a lane change without signaling, and the vehicle was too heavily tinted, as was apparent from the dashcam video. State v. Daniels, 2024-Ohio-3392 (1st Dist. Sep. 4, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant was arrested in a motel room without a warrant for domestic battery, and he battered the arresting officer. It was in \u201cline of duty\u201d for the state battery statute, and his claim it was an unlawful arrest isn\u2019t even reached. Martin v. State, 2024 Ark. App. 402 (Sep. 4, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Handwritten alterations on the search warrant to match the same subjects as the affidavit were authorized by the issuing magistrate and were valid. And, even if this made it overbroad, it was still valid under the good faith exception. United … Continue reading