There was probable cause for a dog sniff warrant at defendant\u2019s apartment door. There was also probable cause for the warrant for his vehicle. The use of an unwitting informant doesn\u2019t negate probable cause (collecting cases). United States v. Turner, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147348 (D. Minn. Aug. 19, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The officer\u2019s testimony and the video show two valid justifications for defendant\u2019s stop. United States v. Turk, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147961 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cA prudent person with the officers’ knowledge and experience would be more than just suspicious that Defendant Counts open-carried a firearm; in fact, he brandished it in front of them. Therefore, assuming an arrest occurred [and not just a stop], the arrest was valid and the ensuing search incident to arrest justified the recovery of the firearms.\u201d United States v. Counts, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148039 (S.D. Ill. Aug. 19, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant filed a motion to suppress under Franks. Later it was withdrawn. The time in between was excludable for speedy trial purposes. People v. Forbes, 2024 IL App (3d) 230152 (Aug. 19, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
There was probable cause for a dog sniff warrant at defendant\u2019s apartment door. There was also probable cause for the warrant for his vehicle. The use of an unwitting informant doesn\u2019t negate probable cause (collecting cases). United States v. Turner, … Continue reading