The Baton Rouge PD\u2019s strip search policy of detainees in an investigative stop on less than probable cause is enjoined. \u201c[T]he Court finds that, for any search beyond a frisk or pat-down of a citizen stopped pursuant to an investigatory stop, the Constitution requires that police officers have probable cause. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff has demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits that the pertinent portion of the BRPD strip search policy as to non-arrestees is unconstitutional on its face.\u201d Lee v. Lawrence, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122765 (M.D. La. July 12, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Petitioner\u2019s search claim was decided on direct appeal and can\u2019t be raised in a 2255. Coleman v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122476 (E.D. Tex. July 11, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant was suspected of USPS mailbox break-ins, and the tracking warrant on his car led to another warrant based on alleged probable cause. The court doesn\u2019t even have to decide probable cause because the good faith exception is evident. United States v. Demezier, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124537 (S.D. Fla., June 3, 2024),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122785 (S.D. Fla. July 12, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The Baton Rouge PD\u2019s strip search policy of detainees in an investigative stop on less than probable cause is enjoined. \u201c[T]he Court finds that, for any search beyond a frisk or pat-down of a citizen stopped pursuant to an investigatory … Continue reading