{"id":58216,"date":"2024-06-29T09:40:20","date_gmt":"2024-06-29T14:40:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58216"},"modified":"2024-06-29T09:40:20","modified_gmt":"2024-06-29T14:40:20","slug":"e-d-cal-motion-to-reconsider-motion-to-suppress-has-to-be-consistent-with-original-motion-new-claim-waived","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58216","title":{"rendered":"E.D.Cal.: Motion to reconsider motion to suppress has to be consistent with original motion; new claim waived"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The motion to reconsider defendant\u2019s Fourth Amendment claim was inconsistent with the motion to reconsider. No. United States v. Garza, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112102 (E.D. Cal. June 25, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant\u2019s 2255 on his Fourth Amendment is barred by Stone v. Powell. United States v. Benton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111843 (D. Mont. June 25, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The third party doctrine hasn\u2019t changed as to bank records. United States v. Powell, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112010 (N.D. Cal. June 25, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The good faith exception provided nexus and probable cause. Defendant\u2019s drug dealing operation went on for a long time, and it was still reasonable for officers to believe that drugs would be there. United States v. Milton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112081 (N.D. Ohio June 26, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The motion to reconsider defendant\u2019s Fourth Amendment claim was inconsistent with the motion to reconsider. No. United States v. Garza, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112102 (E.D. Cal. June 25, 2024). Defendant\u2019s 2255 on his Fourth Amendment is barred by Stone &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=58216\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,126,79,129],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58216","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-good-faith-exception","category-issue-preclusion","category-third-party-doctrine","category-waiver"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58216","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=58216"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58216\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58217,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58216\/revisions\/58217"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=58216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=58216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=58216"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}