This drug search warrant didn\u2019t mention a safe, but that was a place where they could be found, so the search was proper. Also, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Manning, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109676 (S.D. Miss. June 21, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The district court justified the imposition of a supervised release condition on defendant. United States v. Curry, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 15079 (2d Cir. June 21, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s suppression motion was two years too late. It also alleged no grounds. The district court had the discretion to deny for timeliness alone. United States v. Tarantino, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 15122 (11th Cir. June 21, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cDefendant has thus failed to show that any alleged omissions in the Yahoo Warrant were material to the finding of probable cause. There is therefore no need for the Court to convene a Franks hearing, and the motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to the Yahoo Warrant for lack of probable cause is denied.\u201d United States v. Oztemel, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109660 (D. Conn. June 21, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This drug search warrant didn\u2019t mention a safe, but that was a place where they could be found, so the search was proper. Also, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Manning, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109676 (S.D. Miss. … Continue reading