The stop was based on reasonable suspicion, and, when stopped, the defendant matched the description of the person wanted for a recent shooting. At this point, the officer had probable cause to search the car for a weapon. United States v. Payton, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77298 (W.D. Tenn. June 8, 2011).*<\/p>\n
Defense counsel\u2019s failure to make a motion to suppress the search of his house was not IAC because it would have failed anyway on third party consent of the victim. Davis v. State<\/a>, 311 Ga. App. 699, 716 S.E.2d 710 (2011).*<\/p>\n Defendant consented to a search of his vehicle. In his papers he said that he refused consent four times, but there was no proof of that. People v. Lewis<\/a>, 2011 V.I. LEXIS 38 (July 5, 2011).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading