There was no reasonable suspicion to extend defendant\u2019s traffic stop by tribal police based on nervousness. \u201cIt is not uncommon for individuals to appear nervous when confronted by law enforcement, especially when considering Panasuk’s prior interactions with law enforcement, the fact that he did not have a license plate on his trailer, and the fact that he was unable to produce his driver’s license upon request.\u201d It was produced a little later. State v. Panasuk, 2024 MT 113, 2024 Mont. LEXIS 567 (May 28, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant was not seized when his cell phone was subjected to a probation search. United States v. Aryeetey, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94292 (S.D.N.Y. May 23, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The officer\u2019s testimony that all this happened in a high crime area doesn\u2019t need documentation to make him credible on that point. United States v. Adams, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94450 (S.D. W. Va. May 28, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
There was no reasonable suspicion to extend defendant\u2019s traffic stop by tribal police based on nervousness. \u201cIt is not uncommon for individuals to appear nervous when confronted by law enforcement, especially when considering Panasuk’s prior interactions with law enforcement, the … Continue reading