{"id":57872,"date":"2024-05-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-05-12T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=57872"},"modified":"2024-05-11T17:37:24","modified_gmt":"2024-05-11T22:37:24","slug":"ut-rs-on-a-prior-day-was-not-rs-for-stop-on-day-in-question","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=57872","title":{"rendered":"UT: RS on a prior day was not RS for stop on day in question"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Even assuming the officer had reasonable suspicion defendant was involved in a prior incident, he had no reasonable suspicion for stopping defendant this time. <a href=\"https:\/\/legacy.utcourts.gov\/opinions\/appopin\/State%20v.%20Correa20240509_20220313_69.pdf\">State v. Correa<\/a>, 2024 UT App 69, 2024 Utah App. LEXIS 69 (May 9, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Petitioner doesn\u2019t get a certificate of appealability for his search claim on particularity. The state court decision isn\u2019t shown to be unreasonable for 2254(d) purposes. Bowman v. Andrewjeski, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 11424 (9th Cir. May 10, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cWe therefore assume that Dominguez did not appear to be actively reaching for a gun, nor did he appear to be making any other furtive movement or gesture, when he dropped his hands and leaned forward by some amount and, perhaps, raised his hands again. It was clearly established at the time of the relevant events that deadly force is not justified \u2018absent some reason to believe that the suspect will soon access or use [a] weapon.\u2019 Peck, 51 F.4th at 888 (citing Cruz, 765 F.3d at 1077-78). [\u00b6] Accordingly, Officer Pina&#8217;s use of deadly force violated Dominguez&#8217;s Fourth Amendment right under clearly established law. Officer Pina, therefore, is not entitled to qualified immunity.\u201d Dominguez v. Pina, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 11425 (9th Cir. May 10, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Even assuming the officer had reasonable suspicion defendant was involved in a prior incident, he had no reasonable suspicion for stopping defendant this time. State v. Correa, 2024 UT App 69, 2024 Utah App. LEXIS 69 (May 9, 2024). Petitioner &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=57872\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[52,40,35,132],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57872","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-excessive-force","category-qualified-immunity","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-unreasonable-application--2254d"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57872","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=57872"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57872\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57873,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57872\/revisions\/57873"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=57872"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=57872"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=57872"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}