{"id":57804,"date":"2024-05-05T11:48:58","date_gmt":"2024-05-05T16:48:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=57804"},"modified":"2024-05-05T11:48:58","modified_gmt":"2024-05-05T16:48:58","slug":"d-alaska-protective-sweep-after-defs-arrest-not-justified-but-there-was-exigency-otherwise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=57804","title":{"rendered":"D.Alaska: Protective sweep after def&#8217;s arrest not justified, but there was exigency otherwise"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The entry into the house was reasonable because of exigent circumstances because of ongoing drug operations there. Protective sweep is rejected because the defendant had already been arrested by the time the sweep occurred. United States v. Avitia-Enriquez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79920 (D. Alaska May 1, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The court struggles with the rationale offered by the government on this protective sweep that it was subjectively inappropriate, but objectively reasonable. One of the officers isn\u2019t found credible, but that doesn\u2019t matter in the final analysis. United States v. Raban, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79797 (D. Colo. May 1, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The smell of marijuana from defendant\u2019s car justified extending the stop. United States v. Carson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79847 (W.D.N.C. May 1, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The entry into the house was reasonable because of exigent circumstances because of ongoing drug operations there. Protective sweep is rejected because the defendant had already been arrested by the time the sweep occurred. United States v. Avitia-Enriquez, 2024 U.S. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=57804\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,22,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-emergency-exigency","category-protective-sweep","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=57804"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57804\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57805,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57804\/revisions\/57805"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=57804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=57804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=57804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}