In this cell phone search warrant case, the government could seize multiple cell phones found at defendant\u2019s house, old phones and others not named when they were found. Old phones and other phones could also have evidence on them. United States v. Robinson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77296 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 29, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s cracked windshield justified his stop. \u201cThe Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has been clear: when an officer observes even a minor traffic violation, there is probable cause to stop the vehicle, even if the traffic stop is a pretext for another investigation. \u2026 The fact that Officer Johnson was looking for a reason to stop the Impala is irrelevant.\u201d United States v. Witt, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76876 (D.S.D. Mar. 8, 2024),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76875 (D.S.D. Apr. 25, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s illegal search claim isn\u2019t supported by plain error. State v. Fulcher, 2024-Ohio-1609 (2d Dist. Apr. 26, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In this cell phone search warrant case, the government could seize multiple cell phones found at defendant\u2019s house, old phones and others not named when they were found. Old phones and other phones could also have evidence on them. United … Continue reading