\u201cViewing the facts in the light most favorable to Coco as the non-moving party, we conclude there is a genuine dispute as to whether there was probable cause to arrest Coco for harassing a police horse under Del. Code tit. 11, \u00a7 1250(a)(1). We cannot conclude that the facts of record demonstrate a \u2018fair probability\u2019 that Coco committed a crime when persons present during the incident disagree about the events underlying Coco’s arrest. Dempsey, 834 F.3d at 468. Thus, Coco’s unlawful detention claim survives summary judgment.\u201d Coco v. Dear, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 8593 (3d Cir. Apr. 10, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
CoA on the merits of this post-conviction Fourth Amendment claim denied under Stone. It was litigated in state court. Batson v. Sec’y, Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 8572 (11th Cir. Apr. 9, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ten ATF armed agents raided defendant\u2019s home for weapons breaking in the door while defendant was asleep. The statement she made when four ATF officers were standing over her in the living room was custodial. United States v. Santana, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66868 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 12, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cViewing the facts in the light most favorable to Coco as the non-moving party, we conclude there is a genuine dispute as to whether there was probable cause to arrest Coco for harassing a police horse under Del. Code tit. … Continue reading