{"id":57316,"date":"2024-03-14T06:48:19","date_gmt":"2024-03-14T11:48:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=57316"},"modified":"2024-03-14T06:48:19","modified_gmt":"2024-03-14T11:48:19","slug":"mo-collective-knowledge-for-rs-doesnt-require-that-every-witness-be-called-at-the-suppression-hearing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=57316","title":{"rendered":"MO: Collective knowledge for RS doesn\u2019t require that every witness be called at the suppression hearing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Collective knowledge for reasonable suspicion doesn\u2019t require that every witness be called at the suppression hearing. \u201cWhile Appellant seemingly takes issue with the fact that the officer who took Victim’s report did not also testify, the Hensley test only requires the state to prove the origin of the reasonable suspicion, which in this case was the Victim’s report of her stolen vehicle. Simply put, Victim’s testimony at trial that she reported her vehicle as stolen provided the original factual basis for reasonable suspicion to execute a permissible Terry stop of Appellant. See Norfolk, 966 S.W.2d at 367-68.\u201d In the Int. of M.A.S.<\/a>, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 146 (Mar. 12, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Defendant\u2019s probation officer had reasonable suspicion for a search. Alternatively, the district court held that the \u201cspecial needs\u201d doctrine permitted the search without it. There was reasonable suspicion so the other issue isn\u2019t decided. United States v. Alfaro, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 5907 (2d Cir. Mar. 12, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This child porn defendant sought discovery from the government about server seizures by Australia and the Netherlands. The U.S. government attempted to get that information, but they couldn\u2019t get it. There\u2019s no duty there. United States v. Mitrovich, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 5931 (7th Cir. Mar. 12, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Collective knowledge for reasonable suspicion doesn\u2019t require that every witness be called at the suppression hearing. \u201cWhile Appellant seemingly takes issue with the fact that the officer who took Victim’s report did not also testify, the Hensley test only requires … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[124,93,97,58,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57316","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-admissibility-of-evidence","category-collective-knowledge","category-foreign-searches","category-probationparole-search","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57316","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=57316"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57316\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57317,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57316\/revisions\/57317"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=57316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=57316"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=57316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}