Where the search warrant for defendant\u2019s blood only permitted drawing the blood and not testing it, testing it required another warrant. State v. De La Paz, 2024 Ga. App. LEXIS 98 (Mar. 8, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s conviction was based in part on a warrant for thermal imaging of his grow operation. His post-conviction complained of a low helicopter flyover. That claim fails for lack of a credible factual basis. State v. Snyder, 2024-Ohio-861 (2d Dist. Mar. 8, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The smell of marijuana is enough to justify search under the automobile exception. United States v. Demar, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40577 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 26, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Where the search warrant for defendant\u2019s blood only permitted drawing the blood and not testing it, testing it required another warrant. State v. De La Paz, 2024 Ga. App. LEXIS 98 (Mar. 8, 2024). Defendant\u2019s conviction was based in part … Continue reading