This motion for new trial is not for defendant\u2019s claim that officers hacked his computer to illegally search it. It\u2019s not newly discovered. Moreover, there were questions of the FBI computer analyst about whether the computer had been hacked. United States v. Kunkel, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29365 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 21, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A USMJ issued an order at the government’s request for cell phone call data for specific days and times relating to robberies of dollar stores. Carpenter does not apply, and the order complied with \u00a7 2703. United States v. Matthews, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28239 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 20, 2024),* adopting 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235461 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 29, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Minor discrepancies of time in the sequence of events doesn\u2019t undermine the USMJ\u2019s R&R that defendant\u2019s gun was in plain view. United States v. Kunkel, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29365 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 21, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This motion for new trial is not for defendant\u2019s claim that officers hacked his computer to illegally search it. It\u2019s not newly discovered. Moreover, there were questions of the FBI computer analyst about whether the computer had been hacked. United … Continue reading