The government had probable cause for the search warrant for defendant\u2019s house despite the fact that the drugs previously bought from him hadn\u2019t come back from testing at the crime lab. United States v. Clark, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24651 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 13, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In Pennsylvania, once defendant claims standing, the state has the initial burden of production to show he doesn\u2019t. The state satisfied its burden here by showing that the two people in the car weren\u2019t owners and were likely unpermitted occupants. Defendants showed nothing. Reversed. Commonwealth v. Moore, 2024 PA Super 25 (Feb. 13, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s multiple stop sign violations, all visible on dashcam video, was reasonable suspicion for his stop, then he fled. United States v. Lewis, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24622 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 11, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The government had probable cause for the search warrant for defendant\u2019s house despite the fact that the drugs previously bought from him hadn\u2019t come back from testing at the crime lab. United States v. Clark, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24651 … Continue reading