{"id":56792,"date":"2024-01-12T09:37:36","date_gmt":"2024-01-12T14:37:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56792"},"modified":"2024-01-12T09:37:36","modified_gmt":"2024-01-12T14:37:36","slug":"oh11-running-passengers-id-through-database-didnt-violate-rodriguez","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56792","title":{"rendered":"OH11: Running passenger&#8217;s ID through database didn&#8217;t violate <em>Rodriguez<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>With no Ohio cases on point, looking to federal cases, the court concludes that running the passenger\u2019s ID too was incidental to the stop and didn\u2019t unreasonably extend it. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/11\/2024\/2024-Ohio-39.pdf\">State v. Foti<\/a>, 2024-Ohio-39, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 47 (11th Dist. Jan. 8, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There was reasonable suspicion for the search of defendant\u2019s cell phone and papers at the border at JFK airport. United States v. Gavino, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3120 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2024).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe Court finds the tip did not provide law enforcement with reasonable suspicion that the occupants of the vehicle were engaged in drug trafficking at the time and\/or the vehicle contained drugs because the tip supplied only vaguely predictive information about future events and was not corroborated by the officers&#8217; observations.\u201d What happened later, however, provided reasonable suspicion. United States v. Howard, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2963 (D. Mont. Jan. 5, 2024).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With no Ohio cases on point, looking to federal cases, the court concludes that running the passenger\u2019s ID too was incidental to the stop and didn\u2019t unreasonably extend it. State v. Foti, 2024-Ohio-39, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 47 (11th Dist. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56792\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,44],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56792","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cell-phones","category-informant-hearsay"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56792","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=56792"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56792\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56793,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56792\/revisions\/56793"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=56792"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=56792"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=56792"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}