Defendant leased a laptop computer from Aaron\u2019s and he had it password protected. This gave him a legitimate expectation of privacy in it. Thumbnail images were presented to a USMJ for a search warrant, and the court was uncomfortable with most of them being child pornography, but one image of a nude child facing the camera in a slightly provocative pose was enough to support the warrant. United States v. Howe, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57491 (W.D. N.Y. May 27, 2011).*<\/p>\n
Nexus to the premises was shown by trash pulls. United States v. Hill, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56840 (N.D. Fla. May 26, 2011).* On a second search warrant, nexus was shown by direct observation of the officers of defendant\u2019s comings and goings to drug deals. United States v. Hill, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56854 (N.D. Fla. May 26, 2011).*<\/p>\n
The affidavit showed a large scale drug operation for a search of ten residences, so it was not stale. United States v. Curran, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57117 (W.D. Pa. May 27, 2011).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading