If officers saw defendant\u2019s .22 during a protective sweep, the Fourth Amendment doesn\u2019t require that it be seized immediately. It can be seized during execution of the later issued search warrant. A .22 is not a weapon of choice for children, so it qualified as in plain view. Also, moving shelves to conduct the search under the warrant wasn\u2019t unreasonable [it\u2019s normal]. United States v. Williams, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190727 (N.D. Ala. Oct. 24, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Paraphernalia for methamphetamine in plain view in a car justifies search under the automobile exception. United States v. Travis, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190831 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 6, 2023),* adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189732 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 23, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A suit over garnishment for child support in state court was barred by Rooker-Feldman. Davis v. Jacques, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190797 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Pushing plaintiff down when he was resisting arrest was reasonable force entitled to qualified immunity. Cunningham v. Packard, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 28377 (6th Cir. Oct. 24, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
If officers saw defendant\u2019s .22 during a protective sweep, the Fourth Amendment doesn\u2019t require that it be seized immediately. It can be seized during execution of the later issued search warrant. A .22 is not a weapon of choice for … Continue reading