Despite officers waiting outside for about ten hours and seeing no movement from inside, a protective sweep was still objectively reasonable on the totality. People were unaccounted for, and there was a gun and drugs seen from outside the door. United States v. Jimerson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185611 (S.D. Ill. Oct. 16, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant was a Kansas City detective accused of negligent homicide on the job. He argued that he was privileged to go onto the curtilage where the shooting happened, but the argument was so vague it articulated nothing about what he was saying. State v. Devalkenaere, 2023 Mo. App. LEXIS 761 (Oct. 17, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The affiant in this warrant for defendant\u2019s blood in a DUI case should not have included defendant\u2019s two priors because that adds nothing, but excluding it still leaves probable cause. Bowie v. State, 2023 Del. LEXIS 334 (Oct. 17, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Despite officers waiting outside for about ten hours and seeing no movement from inside, a protective sweep was still objectively reasonable on the totality. People were unaccounted for, and there was a gun and drugs seen from outside the door. … Continue reading