{"id":56005,"date":"2023-10-08T08:09:09","date_gmt":"2023-10-08T13:09:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56005"},"modified":"2023-10-08T11:17:31","modified_gmt":"2023-10-08T16:17:31","slug":"w-d-wash-admin-sdt-to-starbucks-is-reasonable-in-scope","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=56005","title":{"rendered":"W.D.Wash.: Administrative SDT to Starbucks is reasonable in scope"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>An administrative subpoena duces tecum to Starbucks is enforced. It is reasonable in scope. Su v. Starbucks Corp., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179355 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 4, 2023):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>In addition to the three-part test outlined by the Ninth Circuit, the Supreme Court has held that there is also a Fourth Amendment reasonableness inquiry that must be satisfied. See Morton Salt, 338 U.S. at 652-53 (&#8220;[I]t is sufficient [for Fourth Amendment purposes] if the inquiry is within the authority of the agency, the demand is not too indefinite, and the information sought is reasonably relevant.&#8221;) If the agency issuing the subpoena meets the three-part test, the subpoena should be enforced unless the party being investigated proves the inquiry is unreasonable because it is overbroad or unduly burdensome. Id.; Gen. Ins. Co. of Am. v. E.E.O.C., 491 F.2d 133, 136 (9th Cir. 1974). Starbucks does not argue that the Subpoena is overbroad or unduly burdensome. The Court finds the information sought is reasonable.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An administrative subpoena duces tecum to Starbucks is enforced. It is reasonable in scope. Su v. Starbucks Corp., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179355 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 4, 2023):<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,81],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56005","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative-search","category-subpoenas"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56005","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=56005"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56005\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56013,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56005\/revisions\/56013"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=56005"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=56005"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=56005"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}