Failure to make a timely return of the warrant to the issuing court is not a constitutional error, and there is no showing of prejudice. United States v. Warren, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176014 (W.D. La. Aug. 18, 2023), adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174790 (W.D. La. Sep. 27, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The alleged misstatement in the warrant affidavit for a storage unit wasn\u2019t material. \u201cIn addition, days after Mrabet’s storage unit was searched, an undercover officer purchased $1,600 worth of fentanyl and methamphetamine from Mrabet, a fact that was included in the iCloud and residence warrant applications and that also would have sufficed for probable cause for those warrants independent of the challenged misstatement.\u201d United States v. Mrabet, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175465 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff sued the hotel he was in that called the police two hours before checkout time declaring him a trespasser and the police who arrested him, barging into his room. They get qualified immunity. Yeager v. Lively, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175494 (M.D. Fla. Sep. 29, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Failure to make a timely return of the warrant to the issuing court is not a constitutional error, and there is no showing of prejudice. United States v. Warren, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176014 (W.D. La. Aug. 18, 2023), adopted, … Continue reading