Plaintiff did not have an objective reasonable expectation of privacy in preventing entry into his hospital room by law enforcement officers investing his shooting. Stoots v. Sparti, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175529 (W.D. Va. Sep. 29, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cNor does the possibility that the government misstated facts in the cell-site warrant application and complaint give rise to \u2018manifest injustice\u2019 if a new trial is not granted.\u201d It\u2019s not the place to raise a Franks issue (n.2). United States v. Hewitt, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 25799 (2d Cir. Sep. 29, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s equal protection argument over his stop wasn\u2019t raised in the trial court, so it\u2019s rejected. State v. Peterson, 2023-Ohio-3544 (6th Dist. Sep. 29, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a Franks civil case, removing the alleged false statements from the affidavit, there still is probable cause. Bradley v. Balt. Police Dep’t, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174952 (D. Md. Sep. 28, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Plaintiff did not have an objective reasonable expectation of privacy in preventing entry into his hospital room by law enforcement officers investing his shooting. Stoots v. Sparti, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175529 (W.D. Va. Sep. 29, 2023). \u201cNor does the … Continue reading