{"id":55399,"date":"2023-07-20T08:53:09","date_gmt":"2023-07-20T13:53:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=55399"},"modified":"2023-07-20T10:02:58","modified_gmt":"2023-07-20T15:02:58","slug":"n-d-iowa-unsubstantiated-rumor-not-rs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=55399","title":{"rendered":"N.D.Iowa: Unsubstantiated rumor not RS"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Defendant\u2019s stop for being involved in a shooting which was based on nothing more than an unsubstantiated rumor from an unsupported CI and the victim that he was involved was without reasonable suspicion. United States v. Cobbs, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124074 (N.D. Iowa May 26, 2023) (rumor is my word, not the court\u2019s).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There was probable cause for the search of the vehicle under the automobile exception. Therefore, the standing question doesn\u2019t even have to be decided. Commonwealth v. Hudson, 2023 Va. App. LEXIS 460 (July 18, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There was probable cause to believe defendant and his car were involved in delivering prostitutes, and that justified a stop and search. United States v. Thomas, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123207 (N.D. Okla. July 18, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cAs discussed above, the Court has concluded that the alleged omissions or falsehoods were either immaterial to the finding of probable cause, not supported by the record, or mere conclusory allegations.\u201d Morgan v. Wilson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123545 (W.D.Ark. June 23, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s stop for being involved in a shooting which was based on nothing more than an unsubstantiated rumor from an unsupported CI and the victim that he was involved was without reasonable suspicion. United States v. Cobbs, 2023 U.S. Dist. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=55399\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,21,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55399","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-automobile-exception","category-franks-doctrine","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55399","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=55399"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55399\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":55403,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55399\/revisions\/55403"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=55399"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=55399"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=55399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}