{"id":55135,"date":"2023-06-12T12:35:10","date_gmt":"2023-06-12T17:35:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=55135"},"modified":"2023-06-12T14:13:35","modified_gmt":"2023-06-12T19:13:35","slug":"id-statutory-admission-of-evidence-in-administrative-proceeding-is-not-a-separation-of-powers-issue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=55135","title":{"rendered":"ID: Statutory admission of evidence in administrative proceeding is not a separation of powers issue"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Admission or exclusion of evidence in an administrative proceeding over a driver\u2019s license is not governed by the rules of evidence, but it does recognize constitutional limitations. That is not a separation of powers issue because it is within the executive branch. <a href=\"https:\/\/isc.idaho.gov\/opinions\/49298.pdf\">Wood v. Idaho Transp. Dep&#8217;t<\/a>, 2023 Ida. LEXIS 63 (June 9, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>An undercover officer communicating by computer on the internet does not commit a computer intrusion under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 1030. United States v. Cooper, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100745 (E.D. Mo. May 2, 2023),* adopted, 223 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100373 (E.D. Mo. June 9, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There was reasonable suspicion for defendant\u2019s traffic stop. \u201cA short delay between the alleged traffic violation and the traffic stop is permissible.\u201d United States v. Kinney, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100746 (E.D. Mo. May 22, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The search of the car defendant was driving was proper under inventory and the automobile exception. He was driving the car and fled from it carrying a gun. The LPN didn\u2019t match it. It could be inventoried for that reason alone. Police used the key fob off defendant to match it to the car. United States v. Wilson, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 14471 (6th Cir. June 8, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Admission or exclusion of evidence in an administrative proceeding over a driver\u2019s license is not governed by the rules of evidence, but it does recognize constitutional limitations. That is not a separation of powers issue because it is within the &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=55135\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,36,12,39,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55135","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative-search","category-automobile-exception","category-computer-searches","category-inventory","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55135","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=55135"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55135\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":55138,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55135\/revisions\/55138"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=55135"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=55135"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=55135"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}