In a warrant for electronic data, \u201cthe Fourth Amendment does not demand \u2018a perfect description of the data to be searched and seized.\u2019 \u2026 Rather, \u2018some ambiguity\u2019 is permitted \u2018so long as law enforcement agents have done the best that could reasonably be expected under the circumstances, have acquired all the descriptive facts which a reasonable investigation could be expected to cover, and have insured that all those facts were included in the warrant.\u2019\u201d This warrant was sufficiently particular. United States v. Archer, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 14106 (2d Cir. June 7, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The evidence shows that defendant impliedly consented to this search by his actions and failure to voice any objection. United States v. Smith, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98857 (N.D. Okla. June 7, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The traffic stop was valid. \u201cThe Defendant’s furtive movements and nervous behavior, her admission that there might be marijuana in the car, and the drug dog’s alert on the vehicle all provided additional probable cause for the search.\u201d United States v. Resendez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98384 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In a warrant for electronic data, \u201cthe Fourth Amendment does not demand \u2018a perfect description of the data to be searched and seized.\u2019 \u2026 Rather, \u2018some ambiguity\u2019 is permitted \u2018so long as law enforcement agents have done the best that … Continue reading