{"id":5490,"date":"2011-11-28T07:49:47","date_gmt":"2011-04-28T17:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2011-04-28T17:00:00","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=5490","title":{"rendered":"CO: Police responding to 911 DV call could shine flashlight through the door, and drugs saw in plain view could be seized"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A 911 call from a woman at defendant\u2019s house brought the police who shined a flashlight through the front door and saw probable marijuana and crack. If it were daylight, they could have made the same observation. Entry to seize the drugs was reasonable. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.state.co.us\/Courts\/Supreme_Court\/opinions\/2010\/10SA367.pdf\">People v. Glick<\/a>, 250 P.3d 578 (Colo. 2011).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant\u2019s car was stopped in a crosswalk, and the officer approached. He was in a rental car that was not rented to him, he was not a designated driver, and he had no DL, which turned out to be suspended. In the car were six air fresheners and a bundle of cash. The officer could reasonably call out a drug dog. <a href=\"http:\/\/weblinks.westlaw.com\/result\/default.aspx?action=Search&amp;cnt=DOC&amp;db=MA-ORSLIP&amp;eq=search&amp;fmqv=c&amp;fn=_top&amp;method=TNC&amp;n=9&amp;origin=Search&amp;query=TO%28ALLAPP+ALLAPPRS%29&amp;rlt=CLID_QRYRLT60678103915284&amp;rltdb=CLID_DB5350103915284&amp;rlti=1&amp;rp=%2Fsearch%2Fdefault.wl&amp;rs=MAOR1.0&amp;service=Search&amp;sp=MassOF-1001&amp;srch=TRUE&amp;ss=CNT&amp;sskey=CLID_SSSA30366103915284&amp;sv=Split&amp;vr=1.0\">Commonwealth v. Lawson<\/a>, 79 Mass. App. Ct. 322, 945 N.E.2d 976 (2011),* Review denied 460 Mass. 1105, 949 N.E.2d 925 (2011)<\/p>\n<p>CI identifying defendant by specific identifiers and clothing that were corroborated gave officers PC when they saw him. He was wanted for assault and talking the victim\u2019s cell phone. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.wa.gov\/opinions\/pdf\/39119-8.11.doc.pdf\">State v. Emery<\/a>, 2011 Wash. App. LEXIS 860 (April 13, 2011).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=5490\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5490","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5490","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5490"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5490\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5490"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5490"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5490"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}