If an arrest was without probable cause, evidence derived from the arrest might be suppressible but the indictment would not be quashed. United States v. Rodriguez-Mendez, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 11558 (3d Cir. May 11, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Being unable to read the LPN of a vehicle at 20′ in the dark was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Blackman, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81861 (N.D. Ill. May 10, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was voluntary consent for the officers to enter the curtilage and thus see defendant\u2019s car parked there. That moots the standing claim and whether his occasionally sleeping there gave him standing to challenge an entry onto the curtilage. United States v. Carney, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81871 (M.D. Tenn. May 10, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was ample evidence of probable cause for defendant\u2019s arrest for drugs, and the seizure of his cell phone was reasonable incident to the arrest. United States v. Loperena-Mendez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82032 (D.P.R. May 8, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
If an arrest was without probable cause, evidence derived from the arrest might be suppressible but the indictment would not be quashed. United States v. Rodriguez-Mendez, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 11558 (3d Cir. May 11, 2023).* Being unable to read … Continue reading