The border search of defendant\u2019s cell phone was routine and reasonable and didn\u2019t need reasonable suspicion. He provided the passcode, and the phone was on airplane mode so it did not go outside the phone. United States v. Tick Chin, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50450 (S.D. W. Va. Mar. 24, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Police investigating a rape case got a search warrant for a firearm. Defendant argued below that the CI wasn\u2019t properly supported. That, however, did not include an argument about the firearm\u2019s nexus to the crime under investigation which was raised for the first time on appeal. State v. Anderson<\/a>, 2023 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 95 (Mar. 24, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n One can\u2019t attack a search warrant in a different court than the one with jurisdiction over the case. United States v. Russell, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50392 (D. Md. Mar. 22, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The border search of defendant\u2019s cell phone was routine and reasonable and didn\u2019t need reasonable suspicion. He provided the passcode, and the phone was on airplane mode so it did not go outside the phone. United States v. Tick Chin, … Continue reading