Telling the defendant in \u201can authoritative voice\u201d more than once to keep his hands on the dashboard was a seizure. A reasonable person would believe he had no choice but to comply. United States v. Hodges, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40752 (N.D. Iowa April 14, 2011).*<\/p>\n
While the police were targeting the co-defendant, defendant was in the car when the co-defendant delivered drugs to the CI. Defendant\u2019s arrest was with probable cause. State v. Hackney<\/a>, 2011 Ohio 1801, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 1553 (8th Dist. April 14, 2011).*<\/p>\n Defendant\u2019s failure to just keep his hands out of his pockets, without more, did not amount to reasonable suspicion. Dawson v. State<\/a>, 58 So. 3d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).*<\/p>\n A jail cell search is not governed by the Fourth Amendment. Plaintiff\u2019s strip search claim was not ripe under PLRA. Russell v. City of Philadelphia<\/a>, 428 Fed. Appx. 174 (3d Cir. 2011) (unpublished).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading