After a jail call, the police decided to get a search warrant for defendant\u2019s car in impound for four months for drugs in the engine compartment which had been in impound. The warrant wasn\u2019t stale because the information was just learned, and there was no reason to believe the stuff still wasn\u2019t there. United States v. Tarter, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34819 (W.D. Ky. Mar. 2, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The search warrant for child pornography was not stale. Defendant\u2019s daughter reported to the police he took photographs of her years before when they lived in North Carolina. The warrant was not stale because the subject of the search, by its nature, was not consumable and was likely to be kept. United States v. Ebert, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 5185 (4th Cir. Mar. 3, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
After a jail call, the police decided to get a search warrant for defendant\u2019s car in impound for four months for drugs in the engine compartment which had been in impound. The warrant wasn\u2019t stale because the information was just … Continue reading