Officers had a photograph of a suspect they were looking for with an arrest warrant, and they objectively, albeit mistakenly, believed that defendant was the person they were looking for. When they attempted the arrest, defendant fled. The stop was still reasonable. United States v. Phillips, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39315 (N.D. Iowa April 11, 2011).*<\/p>\n
Defendant did not receive ineffective assistance from defense counsel\u2019s failure to file a motion to suppress a private search of his computer for child pornography authorized by his wife. Price v. United States, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39500 (W.D. Mo. April 11, 2011).*<\/p>\n
The smell of burnt marijuana on defendant\u2019s person during a traffic stop authorizes a search of the vehicle under the automobile exception, not Gant and search incident. United States v. Kolaczowski, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39361 (D. Neb. March 18, 2011).* Essentially the same is United States v. Martinez, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39242 (D. Minn. March 17, 2011).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading