{"id":54309,"date":"2023-02-18T10:12:01","date_gmt":"2023-02-18T15:12:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=54309"},"modified":"2023-02-18T10:12:01","modified_gmt":"2023-02-18T15:12:01","slug":"ne-failure-to-deliver-sw-to-def-not-4a-violation-and-doesnt-warrant-suppression","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=54309","title":{"rendered":"NE: Failure to deliver SW to def not 4A violation and doesn&#8217;t warrant suppression"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Defendant was the subject of a search warrant for a blood draw. The fact he wasn\u2019t given a copy of the warrant doesn\u2019t require reversal. He clearly knew what was going on. <a href=\"file:\/\/\/C:\/Users\/John%20Wesley%20Hall\/Downloads\/N00009230PUB.pdf\">State v. Svendgard<\/a>, 31 Neb. App. 596, 2023 Neb. App. LEXIS 54 (Feb. 14, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bivens was against drug officers for a search. This case is against CBP for excessive force. This is a new Bivens context, and dismissed. Nash v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25671 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 14, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The government\u2019s motion for summary judgment on standing to contest the forfeiture was improperly granted. Taking the facts in claimant\u2019s favor, he showed enough. United States v. $774,830.00 in United States Currency, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 3624 (6th Cir. Feb. 13, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant was the subject of a search warrant for a blood draw. The fact he wasn\u2019t given a copy of the warrant doesn\u2019t require reversal. He clearly knew what was going on. State v. Svendgard, 31 Neb. App. 596, 2023 &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=54309\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45,14,72,133],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-45","category-exclusionary-rule","category-forfeiture","category-warrant-papers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=54309"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54309\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54310,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54309\/revisions\/54310"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=54309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=54309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=54309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}