Defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss for a discovery violation in not timely processing a subpoena for a street corner camera that allegedly would show that defendant\u2019s turn signal was on and the stop was wrong is denied. The city didn\u2019t timely process it, and the video was ultimately purged, but it wasn\u2019t shown to be in bad faith. United States v. Caudle, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1001 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 4, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A Fourth Amendment claim in federal court is considered as brought under \u00a7 1983. Tinsley v. Fox, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 995 (W.D. Ky. Jan. 4, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2255 claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not raising a Fourth Amendment claim is rejected because he did and he appealed on that ground, too. United States v. Mosley, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1408 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss for a discovery violation in not timely processing a subpoena for a street corner camera that allegedly would show that defendant\u2019s turn signal was on and the stop was wrong is denied. The city didn\u2019t timely … Continue reading