An All Writs Act proceeding by the government to track someone in real time back in 2020 is a judicial record subject to the common law right of disclosure of court records. In re Forbes Media LLC, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218139 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 2, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Officer\u2019s failure to consider exculpatory evidence before getting an arrest warrant can create a jury question on whether the officer really believed he had probable cause for arrest. Hart v. Collins, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217898 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 2, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201c[W]hile the exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation proceedings, the exclusion of evidence obtained as a result of harassment or in a particularly offensive manner is required.\u201d State v. Sarkissian, 2022 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 518 (Dec. 2, 2022) (recognizing rule).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A reformulated search and seizure claim based on alleged newly discovered evidence isn\u2019t ground for a successor habeas. In re Jackson, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 33356 (11th Cir. Dec. 2, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
An All Writs Act proceeding by the government to track someone in real time back in 2020 is a judicial record subject to the common law right of disclosure of court records. In re Forbes Media LLC, 2022 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading