Relying on a file mark stamp on a search warrant return that was a year and a few days earlier, defendant claims the issuing judge and officers conspired to back date everything to coverup an illegal search. That\u2019s speculative. The answer is that it\u2019s all a clerical error. United States v. Bowman, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205572 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 10, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff\u2019s \u00a7 1983 suit over his arrest and search is barred by Younger. He can and must vindicate that right in state court. Shaw v. Carson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205580 (S.D. Ga. Oct. 17, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The smell of marijuana is still probable cause despite hemp smelling the same and being legal. State v. Hampton, 2022 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 488 (Nov. 14, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for counseling a guilty plea that waived what amounts to a completely losing Fourth Amendment claim. United States v. Escalera, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205707 (W.D. La. Nov. 14, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Relying on a file mark stamp on a search warrant return that was a year and a few days earlier, defendant claims the issuing judge and officers conspired to back date everything to coverup an illegal search. That\u2019s speculative. The … Continue reading