{"id":53205,"date":"2022-09-22T16:09:56","date_gmt":"2022-09-22T21:09:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=53205"},"modified":"2022-09-22T16:09:56","modified_gmt":"2022-09-22T21:09:56","slug":"ma-def-not-prejudiced-by-third-partys-response-to-sw","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=53205","title":{"rendered":"MA: Def not prejudiced by third party&#8217;s response to SW"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A third party in possession of Medicaid records was served with a search warrant, and appellant complains of the procedural nature of the third party\u2019s response. [Aside from no standing,] Appellant doesn\u2019t even attempt to show that the exclusionary rule should apply, essentially defaulting that issue for lack of argument. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mass.gov\/files\/documents\/2022\/09\/20\/u20P0959.pdf\">Commonwealth v. Kiago<\/a>, 2022 Mass. App. LEXIS 99 (Sep. 20, 2022):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>The defendants have not demonstrated how Kinnser&#8217;s missteps, such as its tardiness in responding to the warrant, prejudiced them, putting aside that they did not even touch on the prejudice issue except in a one sentence footnote in their reply brief. See Boxford v. Massachusetts Highway Dep&#8217;t, 458 Mass. 596, 605 n.21, 940 N.E.2d 404 (2010) (argument raised for first time in reply brief is not properly before appellate court); Mole v. University of Mass., 442 Mass. 582, 603 n.18 (2004) (argument raised only in a footnote of the brief need not be considered).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A third party in possession of Medicaid records was served with a search warrant, and appellant complains of the procedural nature of the third party\u2019s response. [Aside from no standing,] Appellant doesn\u2019t even attempt to show that the exclusionary rule &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=53205\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[104,14,79],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53205","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-burden-of-pleading","category-exclusionary-rule","category-third-party-doctrine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53205","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=53205"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53205\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":53206,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53205\/revisions\/53206"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=53205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=53205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=53205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}