{"id":53203,"date":"2022-09-22T01:39:08","date_gmt":"2022-09-22T06:39:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=53203"},"modified":"2022-09-23T12:20:30","modified_gmt":"2022-09-23T17:20:30","slug":"e-d-pa-on-scene-seizure-for-a-show-up-was-reasonable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=53203","title":{"rendered":"E.D.Pa.: On scene seizure for a show-up was reasonable"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Defendant\u2019s seizure hiding behind a motorcycle for a victim\u2019s ID to determine whether he was involved in a car jacking was reasonable. United States v. Dangerfield-Hill, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168306 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>District court\u2019s injunction against the FBI reviewing product of a seizure under a search warrant reversed. The government shows likelihood of success on the merits and that it and national security were at risk. Courts should not interfere in national security actions and decisions of the Executive Branch. <a href=\"https:\/\/docs-cdn-prod.news-engineering.aws.wapo.pub\/publish_document\/dd14f429-6a6e-47a1-9059-6190db2df638\/published\/dd14f429-6a6e-47a1-9059-6190db2df638.pdf\">Trump v. United States<\/a>, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 26437 (11th Cir. Sep. 21, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant had his state motion to suppress heard and denied and affirmed on appeal. That\u2019s enough for Stone; he merely disagrees with the outcome. Soler-Norona v. Nagy, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167997 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 16, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Plaintiff\u2019s claim against a towing company that included police intervention that police allowed tows to occur when the owner of the vehicle was complaining it was completely unjustified states a \u00a7 1983 claim. Robertson v. Breakthrough Towing, LLC, No. 19-10266, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168004 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 16, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s seizure hiding behind a motorcycle for a victim\u2019s ID to determine whether he was involved in a car jacking was reasonable. United States v. Dangerfield-Hill, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168306 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2022). District court\u2019s injunction against &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=53203\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45,126,47,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53203","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-45","category-issue-preclusion","category-national-security","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53203","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=53203"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53203\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":53223,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53203\/revisions\/53223"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=53203"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=53203"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=53203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}