The community caretaking function justified the warrantless entry here into defendant’s apartment. Officers responded to a shots fired call at an apartment complex, saw bullet damage to cars, and had a report of a person slumped over a balcony railing. State v. Youm, 2022 Iowa App. LEXIS 676 (Aug. 31, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There were sufficient exigent circumstances for seizure of defendant\u2019s cell phone when he was questioned for a murder. The search warrant for it was issued two days later [, and he doesn\u2019t complain about the delay, but he really couldn\u2019t anyway]. Defendant also consented to the officer scrolling through the phone during the police interview. Rafiq v. State, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 6575 (Tex. App. \u2013 Beaumont Aug. 31, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Accessing defendant\u2019s call logs and subscriber information was not a search. The warrant for 74 days of CSLI in this homicide case was based on probable cause and was with good faith. Martinez v. State<\/a>, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 6562 (Tex. App. \u2013 San Antonio Aug. 31, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n In this NCO stalking case, flying a drone over the complainant\u2019s house as a part of the stalking violated her reasonable expectation of privacy. Rosaly v. Konecny<\/a>, 2022 Fla. App. LEXIS 5901 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 31, 2022).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The community caretaking function justified the warrantless entry here into defendant’s apartment. Officers responded to a shots fired call at an apartment complex, saw bullet damage to cars, and had a report of a person slumped over a balcony railing. … Continue reading