Probable cause supported the warrant to install a GPS tracking device on defendant\u2019s vehicle. The government showed probable cause to believe it and he were involved in a series of cash store robberies. United States v. Rolling, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145547 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 15, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The factors for reasonable suspicion here just don\u2019t add up to it on the totality. By the time defendant consented, the stop was already unreasonable. Search suppressed. United States v. Alderson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144379 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 12, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The state failed to prove that the inventory here was conducted under a standardized procedure. State v. Toran<\/a>, 2022-Ohio-2796, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 2654 (1st Dist. Aug. 12, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n The evidence supports consent on the totality to search cell phones. United States v. Fisher, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145498 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 1, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Probable cause supported the warrant to install a GPS tracking device on defendant\u2019s vehicle. The government showed probable cause to believe it and he were involved in a series of cash store robberies. United States v. Rolling, 2022 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading