{"id":52530,"date":"2022-06-10T09:44:37","date_gmt":"2022-06-10T14:44:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=52530"},"modified":"2022-06-10T09:44:37","modified_gmt":"2022-06-10T14:44:37","slug":"wa-a-detainees-racial-and-ethnic-factors-are-a-part-of-all-the-circumstances-in-determining-a-seizure-under-state-constitution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=52530","title":{"rendered":"WA: A detainee’s racial and ethnic factors are a part of “all the circumstances” in determining a seizure under state constitution"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Under the state constitution, whether a person is \u201cseized\u201d must consider the person\u2019s racial and ethnic factors that influence their perceptions. State v. Sum<\/a>, 2022 Wash. LEXIS 317 (June 9, 2022):<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

This case concerns the analysis that courts must apply to determine whether a person has been seized by law enforcement for purposes of article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution. It is well established that an encounter with law enforcement rises to the level of a seizure if \u201cconsidering all the circumstances, an individual\u2019s freedom of movement is restrained and the individual would not believe [they are] free to leave or decline a request due to an officer\u2019s use of force or display of authority.\u201d State v. Rankin, 151 Wn.2d 689, 695, 92 P.3d 202 (2004). Today, we are asked whether \u201call the circumstances\u201d of the encounter includes the race and ethnicity of the allegedly seized person.<\/p>

As the parties correctly agree, the answer is yes. Our precedent has always required that the seizure inquiry be made in light of the totality of the circumstances, and we have never stated that race and ethnicity cannot be relevant circumstances. However, we have not explicitly held that in interactions with law enforcement, race and ethnicity matter. We do so today. Furthermore, to ensure that all the circumstances of a law enforcement encounter are properly considered, including race and ethnicity, we take this opportunity to clarify the seizure inquiry as a matter of independent state law, taking guidance from GR 37.<\/p>

As set forth in this court\u2019s precedent, the seizure inquiry is an objective test in which the allegedly seized person has the burden to show that a seizure occurred. To aid courts in the application of this test, we now clarify that a person is seized for purposes of article I, section 7 if, based on the totality of the circumstances, an objective observer could conclude that the person was not free to leave, to refuse a request, or to otherwise terminate the encounter due to law enforcement\u2019s display of authority or use of physical force. For purposes of this analysis, an objective observer is aware that implicit, institutional, and unconscious biases, in addition to purposeful discrimination, have resulted in disproportionate police contacts, investigative seizures, and uses of force against Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC) in Washington. Finally, in accordance with our precedent, if the person shows there was a seizure, then the burden shifts to the State to prove that the seizure was lawfully justified by a warrant or an applicable exception to the warrant requirement.<\/p>

Based on the totality of the circumstances presented in this case, we hold that petitioner Palla Sum was seized when a sheriff\u2019s deputy requested Sum\u2019s identification while implying that Sum was under investigation for car theft. As the State properly concedes, at that time, the deputy did not have a warrant, reasonable suspicion, or any other lawful authority to seize Sum. As a result, Sum was unlawfully seized, and the false name and birth date he gave to the deputy must be suppressed. We therefore reverse the Court of Appeals and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Under the state constitution, whether a person is \u201cseized\u201d must consider the person\u2019s racial and ethnic factors that influence their perceptions. State v. Sum, 2022 Wash. LEXIS 317 (June 9, 2022):<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[50,69,53],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52530","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-arrest-or-entry-on-arrest","category-seizure","category-state-constitution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52530","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=52530"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52530\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52531,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52530\/revisions\/52531"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=52530"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=52530"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=52530"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}